|
Revisiting the Crystal Ball
From time to time, I'll go back and look at stuff I've written--don't like to overindulge but it helps keep me honest. After the 1998 season, I played around a little with Bill James' Brock2 career projection system.
Anyway, just for fun, I thought we'd take a look back and see how close (or not) the peak projections turned out to be. For each player, the top value is what Brock2 predicted, while the bottom is what actually happened. For the Brock2 line, OBP is simply (H + BB)/(AB + BB).
AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB BA OBP SLG
Abreu,Bo 502 72 160 30 5 21 83 84 .318 .416 .524
588 118 170 48 4 31 110 106 .289 .393 .543
Damon,Jo 558 104 167 24 8 19 81 58 .300 .365 .473
644 108 165 34 4 9 49 61 .256 .324 .363
Encarnacion 579 117 190 31 13 34 116 41 .329 .373 .603
412 53 110 15 3 17 58 30 .267 .317 .442
Erstad,Da 592 116 192 43 3 29 106 60 .325 .387 .554
631 89 163 35 1 9 63 62 .258 .331 .360
Fullmer,Br 526 75 157 46 2 21 84 48 .299 .357 .513
303 51 83 26 4 14 39 20 .274 .337 .525
Garciaparra 643 135 216 42 8 46 143 44 .336 .378 .641
529 104 197 51 3 21 96 61 .372 .434 .599
Grieve,Be 563 118 182 41 2 27 99 94 .323 .420 .549
349 41 84 23 0 11 43 46 .241 .342 .401
Guerrero,Vl 575 120 198 37 5 46 137 49 .344 .396 .666
432 68 139 24 1 29 77 58 .322 .406 .583
Helton,To 517 89 171 34 1 34 106 58 .330 .398 .598
587 132 197 54 2 49 146 98 .336 .432 .685
Hidalgo,Ri 465 86 153 34 0 23 83 47 .330 .391 .551
352 50 86 16 3 14 45 38 .244 .327 .426
Jeter,De 617 139 207 28 7 22 96 71 .336 .404 .511
614 110 191 35 3 21 74 56 .311 .377 .480
Jones,An 507 107 151 30 5 42 117 56 .298 .368 .635
415 65 108 23 0 24 70 65 .260 .366 .489
Kendall,Ja 532 104 179 38 3 15 79 61 .336 .405 .504
606 84 161 22 2 10 53 44 .266 .335 .358
Kotsay,Ma 555 86 169 26 6 15 75 45 .304 .357 .454
426 59 128 21 5 11 48 45 .300 .367 .451
Lee,De 486 96 133 33 1 28 87 63 .275 .357 .519
416 64 107 24 5 19 57 60 .257 .352 .476
Marrero,El 468 65 128 32 2 13 61 54 .274 .349 .434
203 37 54 11 3 6 23 15 .266 .312 .438
Ordonez,Ma 548 92 169 29 2 22 85 37 .309 .352 .489
593 97 181 40 1 31 113 70 .305 .382 .533
Ortiz,Da 501 111 158 36 0 24 87 76 .317 .406 .531
276 40 78 21 1 13 53 36 .283 .363 .507
Posada,Jo 348 58 95 23 0 18 58 52 .273 .368 .494
379 50 93 19 2 12 57 53 .245 .341 .401
Renteria,Ed 577 111 182 23 2 5 59 61 .316 .381 .388
379 49 116 26 2 7 50 31 .306 .361 .441
Rodriguez,A 623 144 212 38 4 51 148 54 .340 .393 .660
439 87 135 22 2 37 96 61 .308 .399 .620
Rolen,Sc 558 133 175 42 3 38 117 92 .313 .411 .604
408 55 103 21 5 17 68 54 .252 .349 .453
Sweeney,Mi 461 64 131 26 0 19 69 45 .283 .348 .464
575 101 185 44 2 22 102 54 .322 .387 .520
Tatis,Fe 536 86 160 33 3 18 78 46 .300 .354 .472
288 35 68 14 1 13 44 27 .236 .315 .427
Tejada,Mi 102 21 27 6 0 5 16 10 .266 .331 .471
475 73 143 23 0 26 93 24 .301 .341 .514
Walker,To 494 80 155 36 2 14 70 49 .314 .376 .480
248 42 72 11 4 9 44 27 .290 .355 .476
Fullmer, Hidalgo, Renteria, Rodriguez, Rolen, and Tatis are in their age 27 season (stats through Aug. 8). Encarnacion (26), Grieve (26) Guerrero (26), Jones (25), Kotsay (26), Lee (26), Ortiz (26), and Tejada (26) aren't there yet; their bottom line represents YTD for 2002.
What's interesting (to me) is that even the guys who miss the mark (Damon, Erstad, Hidalgo, Kendall, Posada, and Rolen) did have similar peaks to what Brock2 predicted, albeit in different years than expected. Helton, Ordonez, and Sweeney all have exceeded expectations, while only Encarnacion and Grieve have fallen short; it's worth noting that the latter two haven't reached age 27.
Of the hitters who fell short of Brock2's age 27 projections, all but Damon and Posada have had injury problems. Damon's age 27 is looking like a fluke, as surrounding seasons are more in line with his projected numbers. Posada, being a catcher, didn't kick his offense into high gear till he was a shade older.
Of those who exceeded expectations, Helton has the advantage of Coors Field. I don't say this to denigrate him; despite his home park, he is a terrific hitter. But given his home park, it's not a great shock that Helton has been even better than the projections indicated he would be. Sweeney benefitted greatly from a change in position. Had he stayed behind the plate, it's questionable whether he ever would have developed into the offensive force that he's become. Moving him to first base is one of the few really smart things the Royals have done over the past several years. As for Ordonez, I have no explanation for him. The only thing I can think that Brock2 might've had against him is that he didn't reach the bigs till relatively late and so didn't give him as much room to grow as some of the younger kids. But he's basically become the new Tim Salmon.
Again, this is just another fun tool. Like baseball itself, don't take it too seriously and be sure to enjoy it.
Return to Top
|
|